Sustainability

Accounting for Carbon Credits

Chetan Hans
By:
insight featured image
This article explores the approaches that can be taken when accounting for emissions trading schemes.
Contents

Accounting approaches for the EU ETS and equivalent emissions trading schemes

There are no explicit requirements that address the accounting for mandatory emissions trading schemes, including mandatory carbon credits, or for voluntary carbon credits. 

IAS standards that provide relevant guidance for entities to consider

IAS 20 Government Grants

The award of carbon credits certificates in compliance markets represents generally a government grant.

Whether received from a grant or purchased, determine if credits or certificates are recognised as per IAS 2 Inventories or IAS 38 Intangible Assets.

IAS 2 Inventories

Consider IAS 2 when credits are held for sale in the ordinary course of business.

IAS 38 Intangible Assets

Consider IAS 38 when credits are held to settle an emissions liability in the ordinary course of business.

Compliance markets

  • In such markets, carbon credits can (or must) be used to settle obligations to pay for GHG emissions.
  • Pricing of carbon credits depends on supply and demand. The amount an entity needs to pay to settle an emissions liability with the government is also a relevant factor.
  • Example: Cap-and-trade model such as European Union’s emissions trading scheme (EU ETS)

Mandatory carbon credits

  • The accounting for carbon credits in compliance markets (mandatory carbon credits) needs to be considered together with the related liability for GHG emissions.
  • Since there are no explicit requirements under IFRS, entities need to develop their own accounting policy in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors
  • In practice, three approaches have gained acceptance:
    1. Full market value – IFRIC 3 Emission Rights approach
    2. Initial market value approach
    3. Nominal approach

Acceptable accounting approaches for emission schemes that are being applied in practice

‘Full market value’ approach (IFRIC 3) ‘Cost of settlement’ approach - ‘Initial market value’ ‘Cost of settlement’ approach - ‘Nominal amount’
Granted and purchased allowances (Asset)
Recognition
Recognise when the ability to exercise control is achieved
Initial measurement 
Initial measurement at the fair value on the date of initial recognition
Measure initially and subsequently at cost
Subsequent measurement 
Subsequent measurement can be based on either the initially recognised amount (using the cost model) or the revalued amount (using the revaluation model)
Subsequent measurement can be based on either the initially recognised amount (using the cost model) or the revalued amount (using the revaluation model)
Granted allowances are typically valued at zero. Purchased allowances, on the other hand, are subject to subsequent impairment assessments.
Government grant
Recognition 
Recognise at the same time as allowances
Initial measurement 
Initially measured at the fair value of the allowances at the date of initial recognition
Measure initially and subsequently at cost
Subsequent measurement 
Amortise over the compliance period using a systematic and rational approach
Amortise over the compliance period using a systematic and rational approach
Measure both initially and subsequently at a nominal value, typically zero
Emissions obligations (liability)
Recognition
Recognise when the liability when emissions obligations are incurred with debit to appropriate cost in income statement 
Measurement 
Remeasure the liability by considering the fair value of allowances at the end of each reporting period, or a value determined based on a forward rate, regardless of whether they will be settled using available allowances or through market purchases.
At the end of each reporting period, remeasure the liability. The portion of the liability to be settled with currently held allowances is assessed at the carrying amount of those allowances. Any surplus emissions are assessed at the market value of allowances at the end of the period, or a value determined based on an appropriate forward rate.
Remeasure the liability at the end of each reporting period. The portion of the liability intended to be settled with currently held allowances is typically valued at zero. Any excess emissions are valued at the market value of allowances at the end of the period.